When we began this program in Spring Quarter, I worked with
a group exploring the best ways to help English Language Learners. Based on what we learned, I felt very
strongly that it was much better to use a bi-lingual approach. I assumed that the earlier the student
started, the better. It would be so much
easier to learn English when they were still forming their language
skills. I did not realize the variety or
intensity of the impacts that learning English too soon would have on a young
student.
Near the beginning of the Fillmore article I wrote the following in
the margin “can’t we retain the funding and the early education programs but
make them bi-lingual?” I was referring
to the head start programs that had been made available to language-minority
children. My comment is now amended with
a highlighted arrow and a note that says “see p. 333.” That is the beginning of where I began to
read about the effects of learning English too soon. I had not considered that children would feel
that speaking English had so much social currency that they would simply give
up their home language. I did place a
tremendous amount of importance on maintaining the home language as a part of
their identity. I did not think about
how important it would be for maintaining relationships in their
family. I was heartbroken by the thought
of a 2nd grader coming home and no longer being able to have a
meaningful conversation with their parents.
I spend so much time trying to choose my words carefully when I speak to
my own children about social and personal issues. I cannot imagine how devastating it would be
to not have the language skills to discuss my own values, thoughts, and ideas
with them.
Often in this program, my eyes are opened to the unintentional
and damaging effects of a program developed to be helpful by a well-meaning,
but uninformed group. Are we simply too
ego-centric? How do we educate ourselves
to understand the far-reaching effects of the decisions that we make? How do we climb outside of our own “knapsack?”